Connect with us

Markets in a Minute

How Did Investors React to the COVID-19 Outbreak?

Published

on

This Markets in a Minute Chart is available as a poster.

Fund Flows Q1 2020

This Markets in a Minute Chart is available as a poster.

How Did Investors React to the COVID-19 Outbreak?

Throughout Q1, investors faced a truly remarkable period of volatility.

For starters, the S&P 500 fell by 30% from its record high in February, achieving the feat in just 22 trading days—the fastest such decline in history. Outside of capital markets, economic damage was abundant. Lockdown orders left entire industries struggling to survive, and unemployment claims across America skyrocketed.

In today’s Markets in a Minute chart from New York Life Investments, we analyze Q1 fund flow data to find out how U.S. investors navigated these highly uncertain times.

Seeking Shelter

A key theme of Q1 2020 was risk aversion, as evidenced by the $670B net inflow to money markets. Money market securities are an ideal investment during volatile periods, thanks to their relatively low risk and high liquidity.

Also of significance was the flow differential between the two main types of investment vehicles. By the end of March, net flows to mutual funds reached $400B, compared to just $58B to ETFs. This difference was fueled by the aforementioned demand for money markets, as mutual funds are the predominant vehicle used to access this asset class.

Below, we break down net flows by asset class, between ETFs and mutual funds:

Asset Class ETF FlowsMutual Funds FlowsNet Flows (Q1 2020)
Total+$58B+$400B+$458B
Money Market--+$670B+670B
International Equity-$1B+$21B+$20B
Commodities+$9B-$1B+$8B
Alternatives+$7B-$7B-$0.1B
Sector Equity-$4B-$7B-$11B
Municipal Bonds+$1B-$21B-$20B
U.S. Equity+$37B-$59B-$22B
Allocation-$0.2B-$33B-$33B
Taxable Bonds+$9B-$163B-$154B

Source: New York Life Investments (March 2020)

Taxable bonds fared the worst in terms of net flows, with -$154B pulled from both corporates and governments. This may come as a surprise, as these investments are generally considered to be safer than equities—so why were they sold off in such large amounts?

One trigger was the economic shock of COVID-19, which brought the creditworthiness of many U.S. companies into question. This issue is likely exacerbated by the record levels of corporate debt amassed prior to the disease hitting American shores.

The U.S. government’s rapidly rising fiscal deficit may be another trigger. If the supply of government debt were to overwhelm markets, the value of government bonds would fall, and investors would lose capital. It’s estimated that $4.5T will need to be borrowed to fund the government’s numerous COVID-19 support programs.

U.S. Equities Divided

Although U.S. equities saw net outflows in Q1, a deeper dive into the flow data uncovers a much more nuanced story. For example, with the exception of February, U.S. equity ETFs and mutual funds saw opposing net flows.

Vehicle TypeJanuary FlowsFebruary FlowsMarch Flows
Total-$14B-$13B+$5B
ETFs+$14B-$2B+$25B
Mutual Funds-$28B-$11B-$20B

Source: New York Life Investments (March 2020)

Overall, ETFs saw net inflows of $37B, while mutual funds saw net outflows of $59B. These findings suggest a strong investor preference for passively-managed products. Breaking down U.S. equity flows by investment style highlights another inequality.

Investment StyleNet Flows (Q1 2020)
Blend+$27B
Growth-$35B
Value-$14B

Source: New York Life Investments (March 2020)

Growth strategies prioritize capital appreciation, while value strategies seek stocks that pay dividends and are trading at a discount. Blend strategies, the only style to attract net inflows in Q1, offer investors a mix of both.

Betting on Oil

Within commodities, investors added $7B to precious metals funds. These inflows were not a surprise, given gold and silver’s status as safe-haven assets.

The only other subcategory to attract net inflows was energy—investors bet on a rise in the price of oil, adding $3B to energy funds over the quarter. Of this amount, $2B was added in March. Since then, oil prices have continued to slide (even falling below zero) due to plummeting demand and oversupply.

What’s in Store for the Rest of 2020?

Volatility is likely to continue throughout 2020. Uncertainty surrounding the duration of the pandemic remains, with countries such as South Korea and China reporting a resurgence in cases. Further questions arise as central banks, including the U.S. Federal Reserve, continue to provide unprecedented levels of stimulus.

Nevertheless, sticking to a long-term investment plan, and avoiding common psychological pitfalls, can help investors prepare for whatever comes next.

Advisor channel footer

Thank you!
Given email address is already subscribed, thank you!
Please provide a valid email address.
Please complete the CAPTCHA.
Oops. Something went wrong. Please try again later.

Continue Reading
Comments

Markets in a Minute

Should a U.S. Election Affect Your Asset Mix?

Election jitters prompt investors to put their money in low-risk assets. We analyze why this may not be the best idea for your portfolio’s asset mix.

Published

on

Should an Election Affect Your Asset Mix?

U.S. elections are a powerful force in investor psychology.

In fact, historically, investors pour more money into low-risk assets than equity investments surrounding election season. Following election years, investors reverse course and put their money back into equities.

This Markets in a Minute chart from New York Life Investments shows how investors have reacted to U.S. presidential elections over time, and why maintaining your long-term asset mix may be a better course of action.

Market Behavior During U.S. Elections

While investors allocated funds into safe assets in election years, what happened to the market?

 Average S&P 500 Returns in Presidential Election Years (1928-2016)
New president is elected9.3%
Incumbent president win13.4%
All election years11.3%

Source: Morningstar (Dec, 2019)

On average, the market has returned 11.3% in election years over the last century.

Markets also appear to prefer familiarity—when the incumbent president won, the S&P 500 averaged higher returns. Alongside this, it made no difference if a Democrat or Republican candidate won.

Implications for the 2020 Election

Still, with mail-in voting controversy and the anticipation of a results dispute, the 2020 presidential run has stoked greater volatility in financial markets. What reference point can we make to previously contested results?

Following the 2000 results between Al Gore and George Bush, investor fear ran rampant. Markets fell 1.6% when no winner was clearly determined. Compare this to the 2016 presidential run, when markets jumped 1% the day after the election.

But while short-term impacts of U.S. elections cause heightened uncertainty, it’s important to analyze if it’s an emotional or rational decision being made in response to market unrest.

Opportunity Costs

While investors typically run to safe-haven assets during these cycles, the table below illustrates how this may be less optimal for their portfolios.

 U.S. Treasury Bill (T-Bill) Rates
8 Week T-bill0.09%
26 Week T-bill0.11%
52 Week T-bill0.13%

Source: U.S. Treasury (Dec, 2020)

Instead of paying attention to unknown variables inherent in every market, investors can focus on what the numbers are saying.

Building a Resilient Portfolio

So how can investors stay the course during election season?

Broad historical trends show that in spite of unique events, money in the stock market positively increases over time. Staying invested in your long-term asset mix can help capture these overarching trends.

One-off events such as an election provide an opportunity to take advantage of temporarily lower prices. This, coupled with the higher volatility levels that accompany election cycles, offer an avenue for your portfolio to be more resilient as it helps strengthen portfolio returns.

The diminishing returns of cash compound this effect. Over the last decade, cash returned close to 0%. These return rates could fall even lower in the years ahead as interest rates decline.

In short, it’s impossible to predict the future. Instead, equities and other fixed income investments have offered a number of advantages. Macroeconomic factors, such as falling interest rates and the supply of capital, have only highlighted this trend.

Advisor channel footer

Thank you!
Given email address is already subscribed, thank you!
Please provide a valid email address.
Please complete the CAPTCHA.
Oops. Something went wrong. Please try again later.

Continue Reading

Markets in a Minute

U.S. Elections: Charting Patterns in Market Volatility

How have U.S. elections historically impacted market volatility? With elections nearing, we look at over 90 years of market data.

Published

on

This Markets in a Minute Chart is available as a poster.

U.S. Elections: Charting Patterns in Market Volatility

Do elections influence market volatility?

Over 90 years of data shows that volatility jumps 30% in the five months leading up to an election. But while elections have historically stoked uncertainty in the market, in reality, the scale of their impact plays a relatively minor role.

This Markets in a Minute chart from New York Life Investments shows volatility trends surrounding elections over the last century, and how investors can best position themselves amid market turbulence.

Making Sense of Market Volatility

Volatility is when a security has sharp price movements in either direction. The market’s volatility is measured by the CBOE Volatility Index (VIX), also known as the ‘fear gauge’ for the market. The higher the VIX reading, the higher the volatility.

The five-year average VIX value is 15.8, with an an all-time low of 9.1 in November 2017, and reaching an all-time high of 82.7 in March 2020. Specifically, in the five months ahead of U.S. elections, the VIX tends to fall between 14 and 18.

MonthAverage Monthly VIX During U.S. Election Years Since 1928
July14.2
August15.0
September16.0
October17.4
November18.0
December14.7

Source: Eureka Report

After the dust settles from elections, market volatility reduces as investors gain more clarity on government direction.

In short, in the six months following an election, volatility tends to fall on a downward sloping trajectory.

Finding Opportunity Surrounding U.S. Elections

With volatility here to stay, investors can utilize a number of portfolio strategies prior to elections.

  1. Stay the course: The easiest thing investors can do is nothing. Ignoring irrational market activity and staying invested will help you keep your investment goals on track.
  2. Focus on value: Investors can focus on companies with sound balance sheets that return value back to shareholders, such as fixed-income investments or dividend-paying stocks. For instance, when concerns circled around increased taxes on investment income in 2012, no less than 1,100 companies issued a special dividend following the election.
  3. Bargain hunt: Overvalued stocks, or sectors in the policy spotlight, can temporarily dip amid market fear. For example, in 2016 the health care sector saw new policies that investors feared would have damaging effects. Ultimately, these concerns were overdone, and the sector rallied after the election.

Focusing on solid company fundamentals can offer windows of opportunity to investors who look past the short-term volatility.

Long-Term Areas to Focus On

Investors can look to structural factors, such as the economic environment, that have a more powerful impact on financial markets.

Interest rates, low bond yields and policy measures, among others, have a greater influence on market performance. Rather than paying attention to short-term volatility, investors can also focus on policy changes that have a lasting impact on the economy:

  1. Employment: Economic policies that help to promote workforce outcomes will have positive impacts on earnings growth, market performance, and investor portfolios.
  2. Taxes: Tax policies reallocate capital. Corporate tax cuts, for instance, can buoy markets and investor optimism.
  3. COVID-19 containment: The policies in place in response to COVID-19, such as the CARES Act, will have a marked impact on investor sentiment, company earnings, and ultimately economic resilience.

Looking past the election, and keeping an eye on policy shifts, could provide more insight into key forces shaping the future of the economy.

Advisor channel footer

Thank you!
Given email address is already subscribed, thank you!
Please provide a valid email address.
Please complete the CAPTCHA.
Oops. Something went wrong. Please try again later.

Continue Reading
New York Life Investments Company Spotlight

Subscribe

Are you a financial advisor?

Subscribe here to get every update, including when new charts or infographics go live:

Thank you!
Given email address is already subscribed, thank you!
Please provide a valid email address.
Please complete the CAPTCHA.
Oops. Something went wrong. Please try again later.

Popular