Connect with us

Infographics

Rising Rates: Why Value Stocks Have Outperformed

Published

on

This infographic is available as a poster.

Value Stocks

Value Stocks

This infographic is available as a poster.

The Benefits of Value Stocks in Rising Rate Environments

As investors flock to safety, value stocks have outperformed growth stocks year-to-date amid economic turbulence and rising interest rates.

Owing to their strong fundamentals and cash flows, value stocks may be returning into favor.

In this infographic from New York Life Investments, we illustrate why value stocks offer opportunities in rising rate periods.

Recent Performance

In a matter of two years, the Ukraine war, supply chain shocks, and COVID-19 have led inflation to multi-decade highs.

Amid these complex struggles, value stocks have outperformed significantly.

  • Russell 1000 Value Index: -1.1%
  • Russell 1000 Growth Index: -14.1%
  • S&P 500: -8.4%

As of April 14, 2022

With higher inflation predicted for the medium term, value stocks may be staging a comeback.

As investors look to de-risk their portfolios, many are turning to value stocks, thanks in part to their historical outperformance during inflationary and rising rate periods.

Value vs. Growth: Key Characteristics

As a quick refresher, here are the key distinctions between value stocks and growth stocks.

CharacteristicValue InvestingGrowth Investing
Defining FeaturesCompanies with stronger cash flows, steady income, priced below intrinsic value.Companies with lower cash flows, low (if any) income, strong earnings growth potential.
ValuationUndervalued (low P/E ratios)Overvalued (high P/E ratios)
DividendsMore commonLess common
VolatilityLowerHigher
SectorsFinancials, Energy, Healthcare, IndustrialsTech, Communications, Consumer Discretionary

Cyclical sectors such as financials and energy often benefit when prices increase after an economic contraction.

Since companies earn money in different ways, it is often useful to compare price-to-earning (P/E) ratios within a sector. A P/E ratio is a metric for valuing a company, where a company’s stock price is divided by its earnings per share.

An overvalued company in the tech sector may have a P/E ratio of 100, while the S&P sector average is 24. By contrast, an undervalued healthcare company may have a P/E ratio of 14, lower than the S&P sector average of 16.

When a company is undervalued it means that it’s trading below its intrinsic value.

Value vs. Growth: Performance

Looking back, the previous decade saw the worst performance for value in the last 90 years.

On average, growth outperformed value by 7.8% annually since 2010. However, looking at 10-year periods, value has outperformed growth over every decade since the 1940s.

DecadeValue Outperformance
1930s-0.5%
1940s10.8%
1950s5.6%
1960s4.2%
1970s8.1%
1980s7.4%
1990s0.7%
2000s8.0%
2010s-2.6%

Average annual performance of Fama and French (“HML”) value factor by decade.
Source: Fama & French via Mercer (Mar 2021)

Now, against economic uncertainty and other structural shifts, the growth and value divergence is beginning to change for the first time in over a decade.

What is Driving Value Stocks?

On a broader level, the following forces have driven outperformance in value stocks and growth stocks.

Value InvestingGrowth Investing

Broad Market Factors
  • Rising interest rates
  • Market recovery
  • Inflationary environment
  • Long-term earnings track record
  • Low interest rates
  • Bull market
  • Disinflationary environment
  • Rising corporate earnings

So how do these apply today?

In an inflationary (and rising rate) period, current earnings become more valuable and future earnings become less valuable. Typically, “value stocks” are assessed based on their current earnings while “growth stocks” are valued on their future earnings.

Consequently, inflationary periods have tended to favor value stocks and deflationary periods have tended to favor growth stocks. When prices are climbing, companies with actual earnings are potentially better positioned to increase prices and retain profit margins.

At the same time, it is important for investors to avoid value-traps, which are companies trading below value that are in financial duress. To help mitigate this challenge, active investment managers can help identify the appropriate companies.

Sign of the Times

It’s worth noting that this isn’t about value vs. growth. Instead, different styles have performed better at different times. Of course, it’s important for investors to consider a number of variables for their portfolios:

With these in mind, investors can implement the best strategies to help achieve their goals.

Advisor channel footer

Thank you!
Given email address is already subscribed, thank you!
Please provide a valid email address.
Please complete the CAPTCHA.
Oops. Something went wrong. Please try again later.

Continue Reading
Comments

Infographics

A New Framework for Personalized Financial Portfolio Alignment

The MSCI Similarity Score compares a client’s financial portfolio to a model portfolio based on risk exposures, allowing for personalization.

Published

on

A waterfall chart showing the MSCI Similarity Score calculation from 100% perfect financial portfolio alignment being reduced by different risk exposures.

A New Framework for Personalized Financial Portfolio Alignment

There’s a tension between clients’ need for personalization and the one-size-fits-all approach of model portfolios. Traditionally, wealth management firms check financial portfolio alignment based on exact holdings. However, some level of mismatch with a model portfolio is inevitable due to client preferences and circumstances. 

How can advisors meet the personalization needs of their clients at scale?

This graphic, created in partnership with MSCI Wealth, highlights a new framework called the MSCI Similarity Score that allows for customization.

Introducing the MSCI Similarity Score

With the MSCI Similarity Score, firms can assess financial portfolio alignment in a simple, single score. A score of 0 indicates no alignment, while a score of 100 indicates full alignment.

The score measures how similarly a client portfolio behaves compared to a firm’s model portfolio based on various factors. For equity, this includes things like the country and industry of a company, as well as the strategies used, such as targeting growth stocks. For instance, two U.S. technology growth stocks may behave similarly in response to market movements. 

This approach allows for more flexibility to meet clients’ unique goals and risk appetites. It’s a similar idea to someone counting calories, rather than restricting their diet to specific foods.

Seeing the Score in Action

How does the MSCI Similarity Score work in practice? Consider a hypothetical U.S. client that an advisor is onboarding. 

The advisor has assigned the client to a high-quality global equity model portfolio, and is checking alignment.

NameModel AllocationClient AllocationDifference
Core Total US Stock Market ETF--30%-30%
MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF--10%-10%
Total Stock Market ETF40%--40%
Core MSCI EAFE ETF--8%-8%
MSCI Emerging Markets ETF--4%-4%
MSCI INTL Quality Factor ETF--3%-3%
MSCI ACWI ex-US ETF20%--20%
7-10 Year Treasury Bond ETF--15%-15%
Corporate Bond ETF--8%-8%
1-3 Year Treasury Bond ETF--3%-3%
Core US Aggregate Bond ETF30%--30%
Private Equity Fund--10%-10%
Corporate Lending Fund5%10%-5%
Gold ETF5%--5%

Specific funds and ETFs are for illustration only and do not constitute recommendations.

The client’s holdings are quite different from those of the model portfolio.

However, using the MSCI Similarity Score, the advisor compares the two portfolios on the factors driving their performance.

MSCI Similarity Score Breakdown

Starting from a perfect score of 100, each difference in risk exposure between the client’s portfolio and the model portfolio reduces the score.

Risk FactorScore
Starting Point: Perfect Alignment100.0%
Global Equity-7.5%
Commodities-4.9%
US Private Equity-2.3%
U.S. Equity-1.9%
USD Rates Level-0.4%
Final Similarity Score83.0%

The biggest difference between the two portfolios is their exposure to global equity risk.

With a strong Similarity Score of 83.0%, the advisor can see that the drivers of risk for both portfolios are closely aligned despite holding different funds.

A Flexible Approach to Financial Portfolio Alignment

The MSCI Similarity Score helps wealth management firms assess alignment between a client portfolio and model portfolio based on their behavior, rather than exact holdings.

This approach has a number of benefits.

  • Personalization: Wealth managers can customize client solutions without sacrificing portfolio alignment.
  • Transparency: Clients can see how their financial portfolio aligns with the firm’s recommendation, building their confidence in their investments.
  • Scalability: Firms can quickly see the score across multiple portfolios, helping them manage thousands of clients efficiently.

As client needs evolve, the MSCI Similarity Score is a simple and innovative way to customize financial portfolio alignment.

Learn more about the MSCI Similarity Score.

Advisor channel footer

Thank you!
Given email address is already subscribed, thank you!
Please provide a valid email address.
Please complete the CAPTCHA.
Oops. Something went wrong. Please try again later.

Continue Reading

Infographics

The 20 Most Common Investment Mistakes, in One Chart

Here are the top investment mistakes to avoid, from emotionally driven investing to paying too much in fees.

Published

on

The 20 Most Common Investment Mistakes

No one is immune to errors, including the best investors in the world.

Fortunately, investment mistakes can provide valuable lessons over time, providing investors an opportunity to gain insights on investing—and build more resilient portfolios.

This graphic shows the top 20 mistakes to watch out for, according to the CFA Institute.

20 Investment Mistakes to Avoid

From emotionally driven investment decisions to paying too much on fees, here are some mistakes that investors commonly make:

Top 20 MistakesDescription
1. Expecting Too Much
Having reasonable return expectations helps investors keep a long-term view without reacting emotionally.

2. No Investment Goals
Often investors focus on short-term returns or the latest investment craze instead of their long-term investment goals.

3. Not DiversifyingDiversifying prevents a single stock from drastically impacting the value of your portfolio.

4. Focusing on the Short TermIt’s easy to focus on the short term, but this can make investors second-guess their original strategy and make careless decisions.

5. Buying High and Selling LowInvestor behavior during market swings often hinders overall performance.

6. Trading Too MuchOne study shows that the most active traders underperformed the U.S. stock market by 6.5% on average annually.
Source: The Journal of Finance

7. Paying Too Much in FeesFees can meaningfully impact your overall investment performance, especially over the long run.

8. Focusing Too Much on TaxesWhile tax-loss harvesting can boost returns, making a decision solely based on its tax consequences may not always be merited.

9. Not Reviewing Investments RegularlyReview your portfolio quarterly or annually to make sure you’re staying on track or if your portfolio is in need of rebalancing.

10. Misunderstanding RiskToo much risk can take you out of your comfort zone, but too little risk may result in lower returns that do not reach your financial goals. Recognize the right balance for your personal situation.

11. Not Knowing Your PerformanceOften, investors don’t actually know the performance of their investments. Review your returns to track if you are meeting your investment goals factoring in fees and inflation.

12. Reacting to the MediaNegative news in the short-term can trigger fear, but remember to focus on the long run.

13. Forgetting About InflationHistorically, inflation has averaged 4% annually.

Value of $100 at 4% Annual Inflation
After 1 Year: $96
After 20 Years: $44

14. Trying to Time the MarketMarket timing is extremely hard. Staying in the market can generate much higher returns versus trying to time
the market perfectly.

15. Not Doing Due DiligenceCheck the credentials of your advisor through sites like BrokerCheck, which shows their employment history and complaints.

16. Working With the Wrong AdvisorTaking the time to find the right advisor is worth it. Vet your advisor carefully to ensure your goals are aligned.

17. Investing With EmotionsAlthough it can be challenging, remember to stay rational during market fluctuations.

18. Chasing YieldHigh-yielding investments often carry the highest risk. Carefully assess your risk profile before investing in these types of assets.

19. Neglecting to StartConsider two people investing $200 monthly assuming a 7% annual rate of return until the age of 65. If one person started at age 25, their end portfolio would be $520K, but if the other started at 35 it would total about $245K.

20. Not Controlling What You CanWhile no one can predict the market, investors can control small contributions over time, which can have powerful outcomes.

For instance, not properly diversifying can expose you to higher risk. Holding one concentrated position can drastically impact the value of your portfolio when prices fluctuate.

In fact, one study shows that the optimal diversification for a large-cap portfolio is holding 15 stocks. In this way, it helps capture the highest possible return relative to risk. When it came to a small-cap portfolio, the number of stocks rose to 26 for optimal risk reduction.

It’s worth noting that one size does not fit all, and seeking financial advice can help you find the right balance based on your financial goals.

Another common mistake is trading too much. Since each trade can rake up fees, this can impact your overall portfolio performance. A separate study showed that the most active traders saw the worst returns, underperforming the U.S. stock market by 6.5% on average annually.

Finally, it’s important to carefully monitor your investments regularly as market conditions change, factoring in fees and inflation. This will let you know if your investments are on track, or if you need to adjust based on changing personal circumstances or other factors.

Controlling What You Can

To help avoid these mistakes, investors can remember to stay rational and focus on their long-term goals. Building a solid portfolio often involves assessing the following factors:

  • Financial goals
  • Current income
  • Spending habits
  • Market environment
  • Expected returns

With these factors in mind, investors can avoid focusing on short-term market swings, and control what they can. Making small investments over the long run can have powerful effects, with the potential to accumulate significant wealth simply by investing consistently over time.

Advisor channel footer

Thank you!
Given email address is already subscribed, thank you!
Please provide a valid email address.
Please complete the CAPTCHA.
Oops. Something went wrong. Please try again later.

Continue Reading

Popular