Infographics

Taking Advantage of the Infrastructure Boom: The Case for Taxable Municipal Bonds

Published

6 years ago

July 29, 2019

Jenna Ross

Taxable municipal bonds infographic

The Case for Taxable Municipal Bonds for Investors

If you’re a homeowner, there are probably a few things you’ve been neglecting to do. Perhaps the kitchen needs upgrading, or the roof needs replacing. We tend to procrastinate on these improvements due to large renovation costs, until it hits a point where we can’t ignore them anymore. This is the state that U.S. infrastructure has reached—on a national scale.

Today’s infographic from New York Life Investments highlights the level of disrepair in U.S. infrastructure. It also explores why taxable municipal bonds, which will finance the required infrastructure upgrades, provide such an interesting investment opportunity.

Falling Apart at the Seams

The American Society of Civil Engineers (ACSE) regularly assesses the nation’s infrastructure—things like bridges, airports, and drinking water—and scores it in a ‘report card’. After decades of neglect, the U.S. only scored a D+ in 2017.

The ASCE estimates that $4 trillion is needed to bring infrastructure up to a B grade, $1.3 trillion of which will be provided by state and local governments.

The urgent needs for increased investment in America’s infrastructure continue to grow and our nation’s economic vitality and quality of life are at stake.

— Ed Mortimer, U.S. Chamber Vice President of Transportation and Infrastructure

U.S. municipal bonds will be the primary funding source for this massive financing need. These bonds are quite popular with individual U.S. investors, as the interest income from most municipal bonds is not subject to federal income tax.

However, the U.S. tax code limits the volume of non-taxable bonds issued, and the purposes for issuing them. As a result, many local and state governments have been turning to taxable municipal bonds to finance their infrastructure projects.

The Muni Opportunity

Taxable municipal bonds are a potentially attractive investment for many reasons.

1. Competitive Historical Yield and Strong Returns
In the last decade, a lagging global economy led to historically low interest rates—many sovereign (national) bonds fell into negative territory. Taxable municipal bonds provided an alternative source of yield potential, outpacing the yields of comparable treasury bonds in some cases.

Not only that, but in the post-crisis era, taxable municipal bonds have averaged a return of 6.9% per year, beating the 4.6% performance on U.S. corporate investment-grade bonds, a staple in most institutional portfolios.

2. High-Quality, Stable Credit Ratings
Most municipal bonds are high quality with low default rates, making them attractive to risk-conscious investors.

	U.S. Municipals	Global Corporates
Rating Spread	Over 76% rated A+ or better	Only about 10% are AA rated
	Tiny portion below investment grade	Nearly half are below investment grade
Default Rate	0.81% for those rated BAA by S&P	0.84% for those rated AAA by S&P

Historically, municipal bond ratings have also been far more stable than that of global corporates.

3. Inefficient pricing
The municipal bond market is highly fragmented, and most issues are too small to be included in a market index.

This market fragmentation, combined with limited sell-side research and many buy-and-hold investors, often leads to inefficient pricing. Active investors have the potential to generate higher returns by applying their credit research and trading skills.

4. Low Correlations
Correlation measures the degree to which two securities move in relation to each other. In general, taxable municipal bonds have a low correlation to other fixed-income sectors. This means they help provide portfolio diversification and reduce volatility.

5. Longer durations
Since taxable municipal bonds fund long-term capital projects, they are usually financed with longer maturing bonds. Institutional investors welcome this source of long-duration assets, as they can match them up with their long-dated obligations.

A Compelling Portfolio Addition

Taxable municipal bonds have many positive qualities that make them a strong contender for investment. When added to a diversified fixed-income portfolio, they may also improve the risk/return profile.

As the U.S. begins to revitalize its infrastructure, taxable municipal bonds present a strong—and often overlooked—opportunity for investors.

Infographics

A New Framework for Personalized Financial Portfolio Alignment

The MSCI Similarity Score compares a client’s financial portfolio to a model portfolio based on risk exposures, allowing for personalization.

Published

3 weeks ago

June 6, 2025

Jenna Ross

A waterfall chart showing the MSCI Similarity Score calculation from 100% perfect financial portfolio alignment being reduced by different risk exposures.

A New Framework for Personalized Financial Portfolio Alignment

There’s a tension between clients’ need for personalization and the one-size-fits-all approach of model portfolios. Traditionally, wealth management firms check financial portfolio alignment based on exact holdings. However, some level of mismatch with a model portfolio is inevitable due to client preferences and circumstances.

How can advisors meet the personalization needs of their clients at scale?

This graphic, created in partnership with MSCI Wealth, highlights a new framework called the MSCI Similarity Score that allows for customization.

Introducing the MSCI Similarity Score

With the MSCI Similarity Score, firms can assess financial portfolio alignment in a simple, single score. A score of 0 indicates no alignment, while a score of 100 indicates full alignment.

The score measures how similarly a client portfolio behaves compared to a firm’s model portfolio based on various factors. For equity, this includes things like the country and industry of a company, as well as the strategies used, such as targeting growth stocks. For instance, two U.S. technology growth stocks may behave similarly in response to market movements.

This approach allows for more flexibility to meet clients’ unique goals and risk appetites. It’s a similar idea to someone counting calories, rather than restricting their diet to specific foods.

Seeing the Score in Action

How does the MSCI Similarity Score work in practice? Consider a hypothetical U.S. client that an advisor is onboarding.

The advisor has assigned the client to a high-quality global equity model portfolio, and is checking alignment.

Name	Model Allocation	Client Allocation	Difference
Core Total US Stock Market ETF	--	30%	-30%
MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF	--	10%	-10%
Total Stock Market ETF	40%	--	40%
Core MSCI EAFE ETF	--	8%	-8%
MSCI Emerging Markets ETF	--	4%	-4%
MSCI INTL Quality Factor ETF	--	3%	-3%
MSCI ACWI ex-US ETF	20%	--	20%
7-10 Year Treasury Bond ETF	--	15%	-15%
Corporate Bond ETF	--	8%	-8%
1-3 Year Treasury Bond ETF	--	3%	-3%
Core US Aggregate Bond ETF	30%	--	30%
Private Equity Fund	--	10%	-10%
Corporate Lending Fund	5%	10%	-5%
Gold ETF	5%	--	5%

Specific funds and ETFs are for illustration only and do not constitute recommendations.

The client’s holdings are quite different from those of the model portfolio.

However, using the MSCI Similarity Score, the advisor compares the two portfolios on the factors driving their performance.

MSCI Similarity Score Breakdown

Starting from a perfect score of 100, each difference in risk exposure between the client’s portfolio and the model portfolio reduces the score.

Risk Factor	Score
Starting Point: Perfect Alignment	100.0%
Global Equity	-7.5%
Commodities	-4.9%
US Private Equity	-2.3%
U.S. Equity	-1.9%
USD Rates Level	-0.4%
Final Similarity Score	83.0%

The biggest difference between the two portfolios is their exposure to global equity risk.

With a strong Similarity Score of 83.0%, the advisor can see that the drivers of risk for both portfolios are closely aligned despite holding different funds.

A Flexible Approach to Financial Portfolio Alignment

The MSCI Similarity Score helps wealth management firms assess alignment between a client portfolio and model portfolio based on their behavior, rather than exact holdings.

This approach has a number of benefits.

Personalization: Wealth managers can customize client solutions without sacrificing portfolio alignment.
Transparency: Clients can see how their financial portfolio aligns with the firm’s recommendation, building their confidence in their investments.
Scalability: Firms can quickly see the score across multiple portfolios, helping them manage thousands of clients efficiently.

As client needs evolve, the MSCI Similarity Score is a simple and innovative way to customize financial portfolio alignment.

Learn more about the MSCI Similarity Score.

Advisor channel footer

Infographics

The 20 Most Common Investment Mistakes, in One Chart

Here are the top investment mistakes to avoid, from emotionally driven investing to paying too much in fees.

Published

2 years ago

November 7, 2023

Dorothy Neufeld

The 20 Most Common Investment Mistakes

No one is immune to errors, including the best investors in the world.

Fortunately, investment mistakes can provide valuable lessons over time, providing investors an opportunity to gain insights on investing—and build more resilient portfolios.

This graphic shows the top 20 mistakes to watch out for, according to the CFA Institute.

20 Investment Mistakes to Avoid

From emotionally driven investment decisions to paying too much on fees, here are some mistakes that investors commonly make:

Top 20 Mistakes	Description
1. Expecting Too Much	Having reasonable return expectations helps investors keep a long-term view without reacting emotionally.
2. No Investment Goals	Often investors focus on short-term returns or the latest investment craze instead of their long-term investment goals.
3. Not Diversifying	Diversifying prevents a single stock from drastically impacting the value of your portfolio.
4. Focusing on the Short Term	It’s easy to focus on the short term, but this can make investors second-guess their original strategy and make careless decisions.
5. Buying High and Selling Low	Investor behavior during market swings often hinders overall performance.
6. Trading Too Much	One study shows that the most active traders underperformed the U.S. stock market by 6.5% on average annually. Source: The Journal of Finance
7. Paying Too Much in Fees	Fees can meaningfully impact your overall investment performance, especially over the long run.
8. Focusing Too Much on Taxes	While tax-loss harvesting can boost returns, making a decision solely based on its tax consequences may not always be merited.
9. Not Reviewing Investments Regularly	Review your portfolio quarterly or annually to make sure you’re staying on track or if your portfolio is in need of rebalancing.
10. Misunderstanding Risk	Too much risk can take you out of your comfort zone, but too little risk may result in lower returns that do not reach your financial goals. Recognize the right balance for your personal situation.
11. Not Knowing Your Performance	Often, investors don’t actually know the performance of their investments. Review your returns to track if you are meeting your investment goals factoring in fees and inflation.
12. Reacting to the Media	Negative news in the short-term can trigger fear, but remember to focus on the long run.
13. Forgetting About Inflation	Historically, inflation has averaged 4% annually. Value of $100 at 4% Annual Inflation After 1 Year: $96 After 20 Years: $44
14. Trying to Time the Market	Market timing is extremely hard. Staying in the market can generate much higher returns versus trying to time the market perfectly.
15. Not Doing Due Diligence	Check the credentials of your advisor through sites like BrokerCheck, which shows their employment history and complaints.
16. Working With the Wrong Advisor	Taking the time to find the right advisor is worth it. Vet your advisor carefully to ensure your goals are aligned.
17. Investing With Emotions	Although it can be challenging, remember to stay rational during market fluctuations.
18. Chasing Yield	High-yielding investments often carry the highest risk. Carefully assess your risk profile before investing in these types of assets.
19. Neglecting to Start	Consider two people investing $200 monthly assuming a 7% annual rate of return until the age of 65. If one person started at age 25, their end portfolio would be $520K, but if the other started at 35 it would total about $245K.
20. Not Controlling What You Can	While no one can predict the market, investors can control small contributions over time, which can have powerful outcomes.

For instance, not properly diversifying can expose you to higher risk. Holding one concentrated position can drastically impact the value of your portfolio when prices fluctuate.

In fact, one study shows that the optimal diversification for a large-cap portfolio is holding 15 stocks. In this way, it helps capture the highest possible return relative to risk. When it came to a small-cap portfolio, the number of stocks rose to 26 for optimal risk reduction.

It’s worth noting that one size does not fit all, and seeking financial advice can help you find the right balance based on your financial goals.

Another common mistake is trading too much. Since each trade can rake up fees, this can impact your overall portfolio performance. A separate study showed that the most active traders saw the worst returns, underperforming the U.S. stock market by 6.5% on average annually.

Finally, it’s important to carefully monitor your investments regularly as market conditions change, factoring in fees and inflation. This will let you know if your investments are on track, or if you need to adjust based on changing personal circumstances or other factors.

Controlling What You Can

To help avoid these mistakes, investors can remember to stay rational and focus on their long-term goals. Building a solid portfolio often involves assessing the following factors:

Financial goals
Current income
Spending habits
Market environment
Expected returns

With these factors in mind, investors can avoid focusing on short-term market swings, and control what they can. Making small investments over the long run can have powerful effects, with the potential to accumulate significant wealth simply by investing consistently over time.

Advisor channel footer